Author’s Notebook | The Tailor’s Daughter by Lois Baer Barr

Barr, Lois Baer. The Tailor’s Daughter. Water’s Edge Press, 2023, 338 pp., $20 pb. 

I first met Lois years ago when I ran a Jewish Writer’s Workshop at the Highlights Foundation in the Pennsylvania Poconos. We’ve stayed in touch ever since and I was delighted when she let me know about her new book. I offered an interview.

Writing the Past (WTP): What inspired you to write this novel?
Lois Baer Barr (LBB): My mother’s stories were part of the background noise of my youth. I absorbed them but didn’t pay enough attention. As I became aware of Mom’s gifts and mortality, her tales about growing up over her father’s tailor shop became urgent and irresistible. She remembered in detail the family of the pastor of the German Lutheran church who lived next door, his fine children and the beautiful stone church. In my mother’s eyes the tiny backyard her family shared with all the tenants of the building was Edenic with its apple tree, grape arbor, and room to put up a Sukkah every year. Her memories of the Great Depression and the Great Flood of the Ohio River of 1937 were compelling. Finally, I have photos of my parents in uniform. Dad was in the Army and Mom was training to be an Army nurse. Who were those fresh eyed youngsters, so in love and full of hope?

WTP: What was your writing process? 
LBB: Some writers outline the plot of the novel point by point. I did not. In the beginning I wrote a couple of stories. First came “War Stories” relating my great-grandmother’s reluctance to tell stories about the Old Country. Realizing that her grandmother was jealous of the time my mother spent listening to an upstairs neighbor’s stories about the Old South, Mom manipulated her alterbubby into telling her a story about the shtetl. My great grandmother’s memory of a pogrom gave my mother nightmares for a long time. I had to reinvent the tragic events because Mom had blocked it out. That story won a Pushcart nomination, and I was off to the races, but not sure where I was running. 

As the inventory of work grew, I envisioned a book of connected stories. Sadly, agents, small independent publishers, my critique group, and even my husband rejected that idea and wanted a novel. They could see an arc that I could not. I was in love with all the characters who populated that world of the Great Depression and the Great Flood of the Ohio River in 1937. Each character had a story that I wanted to tell.

After seven years, I found I had to slow down, to stick to one point of view per chapter, and cut any stories that didn’t move the plot forward. 

WTP: Did you encounter any surprises, and if so, what were they? 
LBB: After the second story was published at Jewish Literary Journal, I got an email from the granddaughter of the Lutheran minister of the church next door to the tailor shop. She had Googled her grandfather and one result was my story. 

WTP: Now looking back, is there anything you would have done differently?
LBB: Not really. 

WTP: How did you conduct research for this book? 
LBB: Oral history was a big part. Besides Mom’s memories, I leaned on my mother’s best friend. She is still alive and kicking and, although she didn’t know my mother when they were young, they were born a couple of months apart, so her stories about the 1937 Flood, the Depression, and about the early years of World War II were invaluable. 

Online newspapers archives were an important source of information about my mother’s family and about Jewish life in that era. Also Louisville has two great historians of its community, Herman Landau and Carol Ely. 

I steeped myself in the history of the time and read FDR’s “Fireside Chats” as well as Eleanor Roosevelt’s newspaper columns. 

WTP: The title suggests the book is about Bess, Solomon the tailor’s daughter. Yet you include other point-of-view characters. Please tell us how and why you made that decision.
LBB: To me Bess’s story is entwined with the stories of others. Her father’s thwarted musical career. The young Black girl who cooked and cleaned for her family when they could finally afford the couple of dollars a week that she earned. Grandma Dodge who lived upstairs and filled my mother’s head with stories about dashing Civil War soldiers and graceful Southern belles. Before there was Gone with the Wind, there was Grandma Dodge. 

Like my mother, I have always had my ears open for the stories of others, and like her I grew up hearing a myriad of accents and languages: Yiddish, the Mississippi inflected Ebonics of so many Blacks in Louisville, the high southern of landed gentry, and the drawl of Appalachians, who flocked to Louisville for work. 

WTP:  How did you go about finding a publisher?
LBB: Like a rookie. I attended conferences where I could meet with agents. I wrote letters to agents. I humbled myself by asking relatives to share their literary contacts. None of that worked.

I focused on small publishers and got a nibble from a press in Philadelphia that liked the sample pages I had submitted but didn’t ultimately take the book. Then I stumbled on Water’s Edge Press. I ordered a novel from them and found what I had never been able to provide in my pitches, a comparable novel. Dawn Hogue’s A Hollow Bone had so many similarities. I sent her a pitch and the opening chapters. After a few days I received an email back with the subject, “Hooked.” Then I sent the whole manuscript and after about a month, she said she was interested, but she felt that the work ended at the wrong point. The arc was incomplete, and she wanted me to take the story up to World War II when Bess was a young adult and joined the Army Nurses Corps. 

WTP: What challenges did writing this novel present?
LBB: The editor and publisher at Water’s Edge finally convinced me that Bess was my fictional character and not my mother. I had a lot of trouble letting really bad things happen to her which meant that the conflicts in the novel were muted.

I had to give up tangential stories that I really loved writing. As I have ADHD, I need to remember to wear blinders and not meander down every path that presents itself.

WTP:  Satisfactions?
LBB: This will sound superficial, but the cover thrills me every time I look at it. 

The reaction of my readers, so far, has been gratifying. When you make a dinner, you want your guests to say, “Yum.”

WTP: You’re also a poet. How does that affect your prose?
LBB: I regard my writing as exploration, and I am willing to take risks. I hope that there is an echo of the poetry I write in the novel. At this point I’ve read it and revised it so many times that I don’t hear it. Perhaps my hobby of painting also affects my work. I notice details that others might miss. 

WTP: What authors inspire you?
LBB: My tastes are eclectic. I taught Spanish and Latinx literature for half my life, so writers like Julio Cortázar, Isabel Allende, and Sandra Cisneros are favorites. My dissertation was about a 19th century realist Benito Pérez Galdós, and I do love a fat juicy novel full of details about the time and place. Anzia Yezierska and Kadia Molodowsky amaze me. I turn frequently to the work of contemporary poets Ilya Kaminsky and Dorianne Laux. And the Kentuckian Wendell Berry always inspires me. I have annotated one of his books with my own poetic responses. Finally, my bookshelves are full of the work of Irish novelists: Roddy Doyle, Maive Binchy, Claire Keegan, and Colm Tóibín.

WTP: What’s next for you?
LBB: More poetry and short stories. I love working with my writing groups and performing stories at a local theatre. The collaborative process always generates work. I hope that if I find myself writing another novel, I have the strength and focus to finish it.

For more about this Pushcart-nominated writer and poet, Lois Baer Barr, please visit her website.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mid-Week Field Notes–September 27, 2023

Field Notes

Some very quick things:

  1. Last week I participated in Becky Tuch’s Submission Study Hall, a “community” hour to encourage us to send out our work to literary magazines. I asked the group what the difference was between prose poetry and flash essay. The response I received basically said to go with flash essay, because there would likely be fewer submissions. Today, I read another response to this question from Brevity Blog.
  2. Last week I also participated in the Chill Subs Submission Party, another community opportunity encouraging us to send out our work. I will continue to participate in these events as my schedule allows.
  3. Meanwhile, I’ve been working on an essay and on a new YA novel-in-verse proposal. Each week I’m generating new work through a poetry workshop and my own and other’s Amherst Writers & Artists method workshops. I was disappointed that a Poet’s House workshop focusing on historical poetry shifted to a Friday night from Thursday night without notice.

Let’s all have a healthy, happy, and productive year!

Posted in field notes, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mid-Week Field Notes–September 6, 2023

Field Notes

Some very quick things:

  1. I’m delighted to announce my essay, “Anderlecht,” about my retracing a hidden child’s steps in this Brussels district, will be published by the literary magazine, Collateral, which publishes pieces about war beyond the combat zone. It will appear sometime this fall. I have to record the essay, too, and the former hidden child I wrote about, my colleague and friend, Albert Hepner, will help me with French and Flemish pronunciations.
  2. The fall semester has started and I can already see that my writing time will be limited. I’ll have to look forward to winter break for some quality writing time.
  3. If you write for the adult market, and haven’t done so already, check out Chill Subs. It’s worth a paid subscription to stay on top of literary magazine opportunities.
  4. Has your family been affected by the Holocaust? Does the Holocaust figure into your creative writing? If so, join me this Sunday from 9-11:30 to generate new writing using timed prompts. For more information, click here.

Shana tova!

Posted in field notes, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Mid-Week Field Notes–August 23, 2023

Field Notes

Some very quick things:

  1. I received the go-ahead to develop a proposal for a new historical novel in verse in three voices. This one calls for collaboration with another poet. The collaboration was my idea. I will handle the two Jewish voices. He will handle the African-American voice. It’s exciting!
  2. My agent is excited about my proposal for novel in verse that takes place in New Jersey in 1951 with Belgium as back story. She’s working on a list of possible editors.
  3. I dropped two of the seven courses I was slated to teach in the fall. I am concentrating on teaching Holocaust & Genocide and on my health.
  4. I’m trying to finish up a few projects I’ve been working on this summer. My short story, “Stones Tell No Lies,” has been accepted by Kelsey Review, the literary magazine of Mercer County Community College where I serve as director of the county’s Holocaust, Genocide & Human Rights Education Center and teach in the English and History departments. Another short story and one essay are making the rounds of submissions. Three other essays are nearing completion.
  5. I’m leaning into poetry in the fall with participation in four poetry-writing workshops. If anyone has suggestions for creative nonfiction workshops, please comment below! I have signed up for a couple of CNF webinars, but that’s not the same as generative workshops.
  6. One essay I’ve been working on is about my junior year abroad in (West) Germany. For this, I read Diane Covington-Carter’s memoir, Eight Months in Provence: A Junior Year Abroad 30 Years Late. I interview her in the September issue of my free newsletter, Writing the Past. Sign up here.

Happy Writing!

Posted in field notes, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Author’s Notebook | The Persistence of Memory by Arthur Kurzweil

Kurzweil, Arthur. The Persistence of Memory: My Father’s Ukrainian Shtetl–a Holocaust Reckoning. Ben Yehuda Press, 2022, 364 pp., $24.95 pb.

Writing the Past (WTP): What motivated you to write The Persistence of Memory?
Arthur Kurzweil (AK): My father was a great storyteller, and his stories about the town of his birth, Dobromyl–in Ukraine–captivated me. Since childhood I had the urge to visit the town. The Persistence of Memory is largely about both my failed and then my successful attempts to visit Dobromyl. When Ukraine was occupied by the Soviet Union, they refused my request for a visa to visit the town. After Ukraine became independent, I was able to visit the town of my father’s birth and the other small villages where relatives lived. I also knew that hundreds of my relatives were murdered during the Holocaust. I felt a deep emotional need to visit the places where they lived. I felt it was a story worth telling. Also, I have done extensive research on my family history. It eventually became time to visit the locations where my family lived and died in Eastern Europe. 

WTP: How did you develop the flow of the narrative?
AK:
 Each chapter in the book was written independently of all the others. When I finally said everything I wanted to say, I gave the chapters an order. In a few cases, I repeated myself for the sake of the story, so I edited those passages.

WTP: Please describe your writing process.
AK: 
I generally write in the morning, but I never have a set schedule. If I’m not in the mood, I skip a day without guilt. Often, when I get an idea I immediately throw it away. If the story returns to my mind, I throw it away again. It’s only when a chapter seems to insist I write it that I put it into words. I work a lot in my head. Sometimes I sit down simply to type out what I have fairly developed in my mind.

WTP: What were the challenges and satisfactions in writing this book?
AK: The major challenge writing this book was deciding how much I would tell the reader. There were, for example, many details of Holocaust murders that I learned about, but I wished I had never pictured them in my mind. Ultimately, in many cases, I decided to spare the reader. Some of the details I included are horrible enough. Others I left out as a kindness to the reader. My greatest satisfaction is my hope that others like me will be inspired to visit their ancestral towns. But I didn’t just go to the towns and villages; I made many friends along the way who I learned to have deep affection for. I want to break the cycle of hatred and bitterness, “us” verses “them.”

WTP: How has researching and writing your family’s history changed you?
AK: 
I stood at the very spot in the forest where my relatives were shot and killed. I discovered the house where my father and his family lived. I became a good friend of the mayor of the town of Dobromyl, and connected in a deep way with many of the children in the school in he town. It was not only Jews who suffered in Dobromyl. Many gentile families also suffered greatly. I ultimately came to see that the only response to outrageous hatred is outrageous love. Jewish genealogy has also shown me how easily it would have been for me not to have been born. Since I am, in a sense, a survivor of Jewish history, I feel a huge obligation to continue the Tradition.

WTP: You’ve been sometimes called “The Father of Jewish Genealogy.” What challenges and satisfactions does that moniker present?
AK:
 There are many people who know far more about Jewish genealogical research than I do. But when my book From Generation to Generation: How to Trace Your Jewish Genealogy was published, I received literally hundreds of invitations in the 80s and 90s from synagogues, college campuses, Jewish Federations, and other Jewish organizations to speak on the subject. For five years in a row, the Jewish Lecture Bureau said that I was the most popular Jewish speaker on the circuit in the U.S. Thousand of people across the United States heard me given an impassioned, motivational talk on how and why to do Jewish genealogical research. So lots of people began doing it because of me. In that way, I may be the “father” of Jewish genealogy in America. But again, many people know far more about sources than I do. But I’m a good researcher so I’ve had lots of success. I am profoundly humbled by the impact my work seems to have made.

(Editor’s Note: From Generation to Generation inspired me to pursue my Jewish family history and provided consistent motivation.)

WTP: Do you have any advice to those who want to write their family’s history?
AK:
 I’d just say “Do it now” Don’t put it off. While the records survive, people don’t. It’s important to talk with relatives who may have some clues for research. And old family photographs. I’d also urge people to join one of the dozens of Jewish Genealogical Societies throughout the U.S. (I was a cofounder of the first one.) The research other people have done will be inspirational and instructive.

WTP: What’s next for you?
AK:
 In the early 70s I lived in a little fishing village on the southern coast of Spain.  For several reasons, during those months, seeds were planted which ultimately led me to become a religious Jew. I want to tell that story. I’m in the midst of writing it. Also, my wife and I have 11 grandchildren, so I’m suddenly an ancestor. In a gentle way, I need to pass things along to them.

For more about Arthur Kurzweil, please visit his website.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Mid-Week Field Notes–July 26, 2023

Field Notes

Some very quick things:

  1. I spent 2.5 weeks in Europe in June: Participating in a nonfiction writing retreat in Austria’s Zillertal with Sarah Einstein; several days in Brussels researching a novel in verse; and delivering a paper, “Beyond Auschwitz: A New, Interdisciplinary Framework for Twenty-first Century Holocaust Children’s Literature,” at the University of Antwerp at a conference of comparative Holocaust literature. The trip has inspired several new essays, both creative and academic. There’s nothing like travel for inspiration!
  2. I completed my proposal for my next novel in verse and await my agent’s feedback. This is the one that involves Belgium as backstory.
  3. I only have a few days left to work on my own creative writing before I launch into massive preparation in August to teach seven courses in the fall at five schools. I know, it’s crazy, but two are in graduate Holocaust & Genocide Studies programs and I’m excited about that.
  4. In my last post, I mentioned Arthur Kurzweil’s new book, The Persistence of Memory: My Father’s Ukrainian Shtetl – A Holocaust Reckoning (Ben-Yehuda, 2022). There’s still time to sign up for my free Writing the Past newsletter that will be published on August 1 with his interview. It will be simultaneously published here on The Whole Megillah.

Happy Writing!

Posted in field notes, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Mid-Week Field Notes–June 14, 2023

Field Notes

Some very quick things:

  1. I spent much of the weekend researching outlets for my literary writing (fiction, nonfiction, and poetry) and pressing the Submit button. Received one form rejection within 24 hours. Sigh.
  2. The YA historical novel-in-verse proposal I submitted in March received a no-go yesterday. Good reason: My editor wants something equal to or more powerful than Facing the Enemy: How a Nazi Youth Camp in America Tested a Friendship. We tossed around a few ideas and I hope to hear from her later in the week about forging ahead in a new direction. Meanwhile, I have a couple of options with that initial proposal and am looking forward to hearing from my agent about that.
  3. I think I’ve finished my work for my first full-length poetry collection for the adult market. I’m going to send it out in July. I’ve downloaded The Art of Revising Poetry to my Kindle and am a quarter of the way through. Just want to make sure each poem realizes its potential.
  4. Speaking of reading, I bought Arthur Kurzweil’s new book, The Persistence of Memory: My Father’s Ukrainian Shtetl – A Holocaust Reckoning (Ben-Yehuda, 2022). It’s captivating and inspirational, much like his book From Generation to Generation (originally published in 1980 and now in a new edition published in 2004) that started me on my genealogical journey. I will be interviewing Arthur for an upcoming issue of both The Whole Megillah and Writing the Past.
  5. Nonfiction writing instructor Nicole Breit argues in a free training video that structure is what distinguishes the personal essay. I’m going to play around with that notion in the next few days, deciding on whether my project-in-progress deserves an essay or book, prose or poetry.

Happy Writing!

Posted in field notes, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Author’s Notebook | The Silk Factory by Michael Hickins


Hickins, Michael. The Silk Factory: Finding Threads of My Family’s True Holocaust Story. Amsterdam Publishers, 2023, 208 pp., $16.95 pb.

Writing the Past (WTP): What inspired you to write this book?
Michael Hickins (MH): 
One evening, working at my home office, a message from a person I didn’t know came into my work email with the subject line “Viviane Bronstein Castillo Hickins was my grandmother.” Which was strange, because Viviane Bronstein Castillo Hickins was my mother, and yet I didn’t know the sender. It turned out that this was the son of one of my brothers I had never met – so you can see already that this isn’t a very typical family.

So this suddenly acquired nephew, by the name of Luis, said he didn’t even know what his father (my estranged brother) even looked like, and asked if I had a photo of him. As it happened, I had a stash of letters and old photos and various documents that were in a metal file box my mother had passed on to me when she died a year or so earlier, and that I had not had a chance to look into in any detail. So I went to the basement to look for a photo of the brother I had never met for the nephew I never knew existed.

Several hours later, I came back upstairs with a photo of my brother Johnnie as a kid, shadow-boxing an imaginary villain, as well as a bunch of other photos that raised more questions than they answered: a photograph of a road marker announcing the entrance to Meillon (a small town in France), as well as a poem written by my father who never wrote poetry and only liked to read science books.

I sat at my computer Googling to find out if I had any more surprise relatives, and discovered that the silk factory my great grandfather had founded in Ansbach, a small town in Bavaria, was still in operation. My family had been forced to give it up by the Nazis, and yet there was their website, with the tag line: family owned and operated for more than 135 years.

Whose family are we talking about, I thought.

That was the genesis of this book. I traveled across the Atlantic with my third wife and our infant son Max, named for his grandfather, and together with my older son who lives in France, we drove to Germany and met with the people who now run the factory, and later we drove to Meillon – that mysterious small town in the south of France — and I knew that what I was learning about the war, about atonement, about historical amnesia, about repressed anger – especially about repressed anger – was something I needed to write about.

I also realized the importance of atonement and the role of acknowledgement in helping us heal from psychic pain. My experiences in Ansbach were so different from what I felt in Wiesbaden, both German cities where Jewish residents were deported and murdered in camps. My experiences were different because of how differently those places commemorated the Holocaust, and how differently the people behaved towards me and my family. It’s something I describe in some detail in the Silk Factory because it’s definitely something that inspired me to write this book.



WTP: What were the challenges? Satisfactions?
MH: There were several minor challenges – not being able to speak or read German chief among them, but also more significant challenges, such as the frustration of realizing that the answers to so many questions – such as ‘why didn’t anyone tell me about this?’ — are buried along with the people who might have answered them.

It was also challenging to confront my own character flaws and limitations as a human being – things that make me a difficult partner and a less-than-ideal parent. And frankly, it was challenging to write honestly about myself and the people I love, knowing there would be bruised feelings and difficult conversations to follow.

But it was also very satisfying to get answers to certain questions, and to find confirmation that there were truly admirable people who behaved heroically – almost to defy belief – without whom I most certainly would not be alive. And to have met their descendants and to have developed friendships with them that will last a lifetime.

WTP: Please describe your writing process.
MH: I have a day job, and always have, so I’ve had to be very disciplined about my writing. I write for an hour every morning, and I read in the evening. No exceptions, almost no days off. I don’t often write for long stretches, but I write every day, and as a result, it feels like I never walked away, so I never have that part where I’m searching for what to say or write. I just stay in the flow.

I read a lot of non-fiction when I’m writing fiction because I don’t want my voice to change as I’m writing, but when I’m writing non-fiction (such as this memoir), I allow myself the pleasure of reading fiction.

I also read a lot of journals – Eugene Delacroix’s journal is one I go back to, and also letters and journals by modernist writers like Henry James and DH Lawrence (whose fiction I abhor, but whose letters and notes on writing I find fascinating and insightful). I also read a lot of contemporary writers on writing – Laurie Stone is one, and Lincoln Michel is another.

WTP: How did you decide what to keep in the manuscript and what to take out?
MH: One of my mentors once said that you have to be willing to sacrifice your sideshow, and the reasoning there is that sometimes you can fall in love with a turn of phrase or a terrific anecdote that doesn’t serve your larger purpose. And then you have to weigh whether you’re just being self-indulgent versus serving the larger purpose, which is always your reader. I always ask myself whether I’m serving the reader by keeping something in that my gut tells me I may need to cut.

WTP: Were there any surprises?
MH: You mean, other than the surprises of learning that I had living relatives I never knew about (it turns out there was more than one)? Yes, I learned about other people who had been murdered in the camps that my father had never talked about, which can be ascribed to his not wanting to dredge up painful memories. But I also learned about some amazingly heroic people that I never knew about, and it was hard wrapping my head around why he never mentioned them either. It turned out that the explanation was hidden in the poem I found that he had written.

And sometimes, as I’m working on things like this questionnaire or a presentation I’m giving to a local Reform synagogue, I suddenly start weeping out of nowhere. I’ve never cried over my own material this way before, so I guess that’s a surprise.

WTP: Did you share the manuscript with family before submitting?
MH: No, but I did share it before publication. I didn’t want close family to be surprised, and I wanted to give them an opportunity to clear something up or ask me to take something out if I had written something they just couldn’t stand seeing in print.

WTP: One of the characteristics of the writing style, I find, is the tongue-in-cheek voice. Can you talk about that?
MH: I think that’s just part of my natural style as a person – I like using tongue-in-cheek in conversation as well, because I think it gives your interlocutor room to interpret something on their own – like are you on the level or not. I do try to avoid using the tongue-in-cheek tone in a negative way – when it veers into sarcasm, I find that can be a passive-aggressive way of communicating, and I don’t like that.

WTP: What do you think are the three most important factors when writing a memoir?
MH: I don’t know that there are three. The single biggest factor is whether you think anyone needs to read it. Many years ago, I used to hear people saying they were writing just for themselves or just for the desk drawer, but that approach never described me or my process. I only write for an audience, and I always keep that imaginary reader in mind. So I would want that reader to have a valuable and unique experience and not just rehash something they have already heard. And I don’t think it’s worth sharing an experience just because I had it – no more than I think people should describe what they dreamed about last night – there’s nothing harder to listen to!

Another factor is to make sure you’re not punching down – by which I mean, don’t retell anecdotes at the expense of people unless they’re more powerful than you. If you had a bad experience at a restaurant, there’s nothing that makes you seem pettier than ragging on the waiter. As a writer, you have power to tell things and to be heard, and it’s a power that relatively few people master. Don’t abuse that power by hitting out at someone who can’t hit back.

Finally, when you’re writing any kind of nonfiction, even memoirs, it’s vitally important that you give anyone you mention a chance to review what you’ve said about them. There should be no surprises. You’re not giving anyone the ability to censor you, but you are giving them a heads up and/or a chance to clarify. As the one with the power in this situation, you owe it to people to let them know.

WTP: How did you come to Amsterdam Publishers?
MH: Yet another newly discovered relative, Peter Kupfer, was also working on a memoir about his family’s travails during the Holocaust, and when he posted to social media that he was getting published, I congratulated him and asked him who his publisher was and whether he minded if I contact them as well. He very graciously pointed me to Amsterdam Publishers.

WTP: What’s next for you?
MH: I’m doing a bit of speaking about this topic, because one of the most important things I’ve learned is that we all have to do a better job of acknowledging what happened, and also of acknowledging when we’ve done harm. One of the things I learned through my travels is that even when people have wronged you, even grievously, a heartfelt apology goes a long way towards helping you heal. There doesn’t necessarily have to be monetary reparations – atonement comes in many forms, some of them as simple as being willing to acknowledge a wrong, to share or commiserate with someone. It’s important for us as Jews to receive this, and as Jewish Americans, it’s important to commiserate with others and show empathy.

And then it’s on to the next novel – set in 1980s Paris. 
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mid-Week Field Notes–May 31, 2023

Field Notes

Some very quick things:

  1. I haven’t had much to share recently. But this month, a new poem, “How Loud Bones Speak,” appeared in Poetica.
  2. I’m still working on my full-length poetry collection and received two conflicting critiques. One came from the publisher of a well-known literary magazine who is familiar with my work. He gave individual poem feedback. The other, a poet who also writes about ancestry, suggested I reframe the manuscript around a single ancestor and only focus on her and her descendants. She also gave individual poem feedback. I am inclined to just take the suggestions on individual poems and leave the structure of the manuscript as is. Any thoughts on this?
  3. I’m working on a book proposal to turn my dissertation into a book. It’s a most interesting process and now my proposal’s content has the flavor of the dissertation but has a new thesis and structure. I relied heavily on Scott Norton’s (formerly a director of editing at University of California Press) chapters in Revising Your Dissertation, edited by Beth Luey. I am currently generating my sample chapters.
  4. A new issue of Writing the Past will be issued tomorrow. Not subscribed to this free newsletter yet? Sign up here.

Happy Writing!

Posted in field notes, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Mid-Week Field Notes–April 25, 2023

Field Notes

Some very quick things:

  1. Last week I attended the Texas Library Association conference in Austin. I served on a YA memoir and biography panel and discussed Ethel’s Song: Ethel Rosenberg’s Life in Poems (Calkins Creek, 2022). My publisher also hosted a book signing that included the ARC of Facing the Enemy: How a Nazi Youth Camp in America Tested a Friendship (Calkins Creek, 2023). It was great to connect with librarians and hear how much they enjoy poetry, novels in verse, and my historical novels in verse in particular.
  2. Rejections keep pouring in from the few submissions I’ve made. Sigh.
  3. I’ve made a list of all the writing projects I want to work on in May, June, July, and August. These range from book proposals to short stories to academic journal articles. It’s going to be busy but I hope it’s also going to be highly productive, although I will simultaneously be teaching four asynchronous classes, not including my own workshops.
  4. If you’re looking for inexpensive writing opportunities, check out the schedule of Amherst Writers & Artists Write Around the World sessions in May. Each day one or more sessions invite writers to generate new writing using timed prompts via a $10, $15, or $20 donation to this nonprofit organization with social justice initiatives. I am leading workshops in Writing Family History and Food, Glorious Food.
  5. A new issue of Writing the Past will be issued on May 1. Not subscribed to this free newsletter yet? Sign up here.

Happy Writing!

Posted in field notes, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment